John Wiley & Sons Experimental Methods in Survey Research Cover A thorough and comprehensive guide to the theoretical, practical, and methodological approaches used.. Product #: 978-1-119-08374-0 Regular price: $104.67 $104.67 Auf Lager

Experimental Methods in Survey Research

Techniques that Combine Random Sampling with Random Assignment

Lavrakas, Paul J. / Traugott, Michael W. / Kennedy, Courtney / Holbrook, Allyson L. / de Leeuw, Edith D. / West, Brady T. (Herausgeber)

Wiley Series in Survey Methodology

Cover

1. Auflage November 2019
544 Seiten, Hardcover
Wiley & Sons Ltd

ISBN: 978-1-119-08374-0
John Wiley & Sons

Jetzt kaufen

Preis: 112,00 €

Preis inkl. MwSt, zzgl. Versand

Weitere Versionen

epubmobipdf

A thorough and comprehensive guide to the theoretical, practical, and methodological approaches used in survey experiments across disciplines such as political science, health sciences, sociology, economics, psychology, and marketing

This book explores and explains the broad range of experimental designs embedded in surveys that use both probability and non-probability samples. It approaches the usage of survey-based experiments with a Total Survey Error (TSE) perspective, which provides insight on the strengths and weaknesses of the techniques used.

Experimental Methods in Survey Research: Techniques that Combine Random Sampling with Random Assignment addresses experiments on within-unit coverage, reducing nonresponse, question and questionnaire design, minimizing interview measurement bias, using adaptive design, trend data, vignettes, the analysis of data from survey experiments, and other topics, across social, behavioral, and marketing science domains.

Each chapter begins with a description of the experimental method or application and its importance, followed by reference to relevant literature. At least one detailed original experimental case study then follows to illustrate the experimental method's deployment, implementation, and analysis from a TSE perspective. The chapters conclude with theoretical and practical implications on the usage of the experimental method addressed. In summary, this book:
* Fills a gap in the current literature by successfully combining the subjects of survey methodology and experimental methodology in an effort to maximize both internal validity and external validity
* Offers a wide range of types of experimentation in survey research with in-depth attention to their various methodologies and applications
* Is edited by internationally recognized experts in the field of survey research/methodology and in the usage of survey-based experimentation --featuring contributions from across a variety of disciplines in the social and behavioral sciences
* Presents advances in the field of survey experiments, as well as relevant references in each chapter for further study
* Includes more than 20 types of original experiments carried out within probability sample surveys
* Addresses myriad practical and operational aspects for designing, implementing, and analyzing survey-based experiments by using a Total Survey Error perspective to address the strengths and weaknesses of each experimental technique and method

Experimental Methods in Survey Research: Techniques that Combine Random Sampling with Random Assignment is an ideal reference for survey researchers and practitioners in areas such political science, health sciences, sociology, economics, psychology, public policy, data collection, data science, and marketing. It is also a very useful textbook for graduate-level courses on survey experiments and survey methodology.

Paul J. Lavrakas, PhD, is Senior Fellow at the NORC at the University of Chicago, Adjunct Professor at University of Illinois-Chicago, Senior Methodologist at the Social Research Centre of Australian National University and at the Office for Survey Research at Michigan State University.

Michael W. Traugott, PhD, is Research Professor in the Institute for Social Research at the University of Michigan.

Courtney Kennedy, PhD, is Director of Survey Research at Pew Research Center in Washington, DC.

Allyson L. Holbrook, PhD, is Professor of Public Administration and Psychology at the University of Illinois-Chicago.

Edith D. de Leeuw, PhD, is Professor of Survey Methodology in the Department of Methodology and Statistics at Utrecht University.

Brady T. West, PhD, is Research Associate Professor in the Survey Research Center at the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor.

List of Contributors xix

Preface by Dr. Judith Tanur xxv

About the Companion Website xxix

1 Probability Survey-Based Experimentation and the Balancing of Internal and External Validity Concerns 1
Paul J. Lavrakas, Courtney Kennedy, Edith D. de Leeuw, Brady T. West, Allyson L. Holbrook, and Michael W. Traugott

1.1 Validity Concerns in Survey Research 3

1.2 Survey Validity and Survey Error 5

1.3 Internal Validity 6

1.4 Threats to Internal Validity 8

1.5 External Validity 11

1.6 Pairing Experimental Designs with Probability Sampling 12

1.7 Some Thoughts on Conducting Experiments with Online Convenience Samples 12

1.8 The Contents of this Book 15

References 15

Part I Introduction to Section on Within-Unit Coverage 19
Paul J. Lavrakas and Edith D. de Leeuw

2 Within-Household Selection Methods: A Critical Review and Experimental Examination 23
Jolene D. Smyth, Kristen Olson, and Mathew Stange

2.1 Introduction 23

2.2 Within-Household Selection and Total Survey Error 24

2.3 Types of within-Household Selection Techniques 24

2.4 Within-Household Selection in Telephone Surveys 25

2.5 Within-Household Selection in Self-Administered Surveys 26

2.6 Methodological Requirements of Experimentally Studying Within-Household Selection Methods 27

2.7 Empirical Example 30

2.8 Data and Methods 31

2.9 Analysis Plan 34

2.10 Results 35

2.11 Discussion and Conclusions 40

References 42

3 Measuring within-Household Contamination: The Challenge of Interviewing More Than One Member of a Household 47
Colm O'Muircheartaigh, Stephen Smith, and Jaclyn S.Wong

3.1 Literature Review 47

3.2 Data and Methods 50

Investigators 53

Field/Project Directors 53

3.3 The Sequence of Analyses 55

3.4 Results 55

3.5 Effect on Standard Errors of the Estimates 57

3.6 Effect on Response Rates 58

3.7 Effect on Responses 61

3.8 Substantive Results 64

References 64

Part II Survey Experiments with Techniques to Reduce Nonresponse 67
Edith D. de Leeuw and Paul J. Lavrakas

4 Survey Experiments on Interactions and Nonresponse: A Case Study of Incentives and Modes 69
A. Bianchi and S. Biffignandi

4.1 Introduction 69

4.2 Literature Overview 70

4.3 Case Study: Examining the Interaction between Incentives and Mode 73

4.4 Concluding Remarks 83

Acknowledgments 85

References 86

5 Experiments on the Effects of Advance Letters in Surveys 89
Susanne Vogl, Jennifer A. Parsons, Linda K. Owens, and Paul J. Lavrakas

5.1 Introduction 89

5.2 State of the Art on Experimentation on the Effect of Advance Letters 93

5.3 Case Studies: Experimental Research on the Effect of Advance Letters 95

5.4 Case Study I: Violence against Men in Intimate Relationships 96

5.5 Case Study II: The Neighborhood Crime and Justice Study 100

5.6 Discussion 106

5.7 Research Agenda for the Future 107

References 108

Part III Overview of the Section on the Questionnaire 111
Allyson Holbrook and Michael W. Traugott

6 Experiments on the Design and Evaluation of Complex Survey Questions 113
Paul Beatty, Carol Cosenza, and Floyd J. Fowler Jr.

6.1 Question Construction: Dangling Qualifiers 115

6.2 Overall Meanings of Question Can Be Obscured by Detailed Words 117

6.3 Are Two Questions Better than One? 119

6.4 The Use of Multiple Questions to Simplify Response Judgments 121

6.5 The Effect of Context or Framing on Answers 122

6.6 Do Questionnaire Effects Vary Across Sub-groups of Respondents? 124

6.7 Discussion 126

References 128

7 Impact of Response Scale Features on Survey Responses to Behavioral Questions 131
Florian Keusch and Ting Yan

7.1 Introduction 131

7.2 Previous Work on Scale Design Features 132

7.3 Methods 134

7.4 Results 136

7.5 Discussion 141

Acknowledgment 143

7.A Question Wording 143

7.A.1 Experimental Questions (One Question Per Screen) 143

7.A.2 Validation Questions (One Per Screen) 144

7.A.3 GfK Profile Questions (Not Part of the Questionnaire) 145

7.B Test of Interaction Effects 145

References 146

8 Mode Effects Versus Question Format Effects: An Experimental Investigation of Measurement Error Implemented in a Probability-Based Online Panel 151
Edith D. de Leeuw, Joop Hox, and Annette Scherpenzeel

8.1 Introduction 151

8.2 Experiments and Probability-Based Online Panels 153

8.3 Mixed-Mode Question Format Experiments 154

8.4 Summary and Discussion 161

Acknowledgments 162

References 162

9 Conflicting Cues: Item Nonresponse and Experimental Mortality 167
David J. Ciuk and Berwood A. Yost

9.1 Introduction 167

9.2 Survey Experiments and Item Nonresponse 167

9.3 Case Study: Conflicting Cues and Item Nonresponse 170

9.4 Methods 170

9.5 Issue Selection 171

9.6 Experimental Conditions and Measures 172

9.7 Results 173

9.8 Addressing Item Nonresponse in Survey Experiments 174

9.9 Summary 178

References 179

10 Application of a List Experiment at the Population Level: The Case of Opposition to Immigration in the Netherlands 181
Mathew J. Creighton, Philip S. Brenner, Peter Schmidt, and Diana Zavala-Rojas

10.1 Fielding the Item Count Technique (ICT) 183

10.2 Analyzing the Item Count Technique (ICT) 185

10.3 An Application of ICT: Attitudes toward Immigrants in the Netherlands 186

10.4 Limitations of ICT 190

References 192

Part IV Introduction to Section on Interviewers 195
Brady T. West and Edith D. de Leeuw

11 Race- and Ethnicity-of-Interviewer Effects 197
Allyson L. Holbrook, Timothy P. Johnson, and Maria Krysan

11.1 Introduction 197

11.2 The Current Research 205

11.3 Respondents and Procedures 207

11.4 Measures 207

11.5 Analysis 210

11.6 Results 211

11.7 Discussion and Conclusion 219

References 221

12 Investigating Interviewer Effects and Confounds in Survey-Based Experimentation 225
Paul J. Lavrakas, Jenny Kelly, and Colleen McClain

12.1 Studying Interviewer Effects Using a Post hoc Experimental Design 226

12.2 Studying Interviewer Effects Using A Priori Experimental Designs 230

12.3 An Original Experiment on the Effects of Interviewers Administering Only One Treatment vs. Interviewers Administrating Multiple Treatments 232

12.4 Discussion 239

References 242

Part V Introduction to Section on Adaptive Design 245
Courtney Kennedy and Brady T. West

13 Using Experiments to Assess Interactive Feedback That Improves Response Quality in Web Surveys 247
Tanja Kunz and Marek Fuchs

13.1 Introduction 247

13.2 Case Studies - Interactive Feedback in Web Surveys 251

13.3 Methodological Issues in Experimental Visual Design Studies 258

References 269

14 Randomized Experiments for Web-Mail Surveys Conducted Using Address-Based Samples of the General Population 275
Z. Tuba Suzer-Gurtekin, Mahmoud Elkasabi, James M. Lepkowski, Mingnan Liu, and Richard Curtin

14.1 Introduction 275

14.2 Study Design and Methods 278

14.3 Results 281

14.4 Discussion 285

References 287

Part VI Introduction to Section on Special Surveys 291
Michael W. Traugott and Edith D. de Leeuw

15 Mounting Multiple Experiments on Longitudinal Social Surveys: Design and Implementation Considerations 293
Peter Lynn and Annette Jäckle

15.1 Introduction and Overview 293

15.2 Types of Experiments that Can Be Mounted in a Longitudinal Survey 294

15.3 Longitudinal Experiments and Experiments in Longitudinal Surveys 295

15.4 Longitudinal Surveys that Serve as Platforms for Experimentation 296

15.5 The Understanding Society Innovation Panel 298

15.6 Avoiding Confounding of Experiments 299

15.7 Allocation Procedures 301

15.8 Refreshment Samples 304

15.9 Discussion 305

15.A Appendix: Stata Syntax to Produce Table 15.3 Treatment Allocations 306

References 306

16 Obstacles and Opportunities for Experiments in Establishment Surveys Supporting Official Statistics 309
Diane K. Willimack and Jaki S. McCarthy

16.1 Introduction 309

16.2 Some Key Differences between Household and Establishment Surveys 310

16.3 Existing Literature Featuring Establishment Survey Experiments 312

16.4 Key Considerations for Experimentation in Establishment Surveys 314

16.5 Examples of Experimentation in Establishment Surveys 318

16.6 Discussion and Concluding Remarks 323

Acknowledgments 324

References 324

Part VII Introduction to Section on Trend Data 327
Michael W. Traugott and Paul J. Lavrakas

17 Tracking Question-Wording Experiments across Time in the General Social Survey, 1984-2014 329
Tom W. Smith and Jaesok Son

17.1 Introduction 329

17.2 GSS Question-Wording Experiment on Spending Priorities 330

17.3 Experimental Analysis 330

17.4 Summary and Conclusion 338

17.A National Spending Priority Items 339

References 340

18 Survey Experiments and Changes in Question Wording in Repeated Cross-Sectional Surveys 343
Allyson L. Holbrook, David Sterrett, Andrew W. Crosby, Marina Stavrakantonaki, Xiaoheng Wang, Tianshu Zhao, and Timothy P. Johnson

18.1 Introduction 343

18.2 Background 344

18.3 Two Case Studies 347

18.4 Implications and Conclusions 362

Acknowledgments 364

References 364

Part VIII Vignette Experiments in Surveys 369
Allyson Holbrook and Paul J. Lavrakas

19 Are Factorial Survey Experiments Prone to Survey Mode Effects? 371
Katrin Auspurg, Thomas Hinz, and Sandra Walzenbach

19.1 Introduction 371

19.2 Idea and Scope of Factorial Survey Experiments 372

19.3 Mode Effects 373

19.4 Case Study 378

19.5 Conclusion 388

References 390

20 Validity Aspects of Vignette Experiments: Expected "What-If" Differences between Reports of Behavioral Intentions and Actual Behavior 393
Stefanie Eifler and Knut Petzold

20.1 Outline of the Problem 393

20.2 Research Findings from Our Experimental Work 399

20.3 Discussion 411

References 413

Part IX Introduction to Section on Analysis 417
Brady T. West and Courtney Kennedy

21 Identities and Intersectionality: A Case for Purposive Sampling in Survey-Experimental Research 419
Samara Klar and Thomas J. Leeper

21.1 Introduction 419

21.2 Common Techniques for Survey Experiments on Identity 420

21.3 How Limited are Representative Samples for Intersectionality Research? 426

21.4 Conclusions and Discussion 430

Author Biographies 431

References 431

22 Designing Probability Samples to Study Treatment Effect Heterogeneity 435
Elizabeth Tipton, David S. Yeager, Ronaldo Iachan, and Barbara Schneider

22.1 Introduction 435

22.2 Nesting a Randomized Treatment in a National Probability Sample: The NSLM 446

22.3 Discussion and Conclusions 451

Acknowledgments 453

References 453

23 Design-Based Analysis of Experiments Embedded in Probability Samples 457
Jan A. van den Brakel

23.1 Introduction 457

23.2 Design of Embedded Experiments 458

23.3 Design-Based Inference for Embedded Experiments with One Treatment Factor 460

23.4 Analysis of Experiments with Clusters of Sampling Units as Experimental Units 466

23.5 Factorial Designs 468

23.6 A Mixed-Mode Experiment in the Dutch Crime Victimization Survey 472

23.7 Discussion 477

Acknowledgments 478

References 478

24 Extending the Within-Persons Experimental Design: The Multitrait-Multierror (MTME) Approach 481
Alexandru Cernat and Daniel L. Oberski

24.1 Introduction 481

24.2 The Multitrait-Multierror (MTME) Framework 482

24.3 Designing the MTME Experiment 487

24.4 Statistical Estimation for the MTME Approach 489

24.5 Measurement Error in Attitudes toward Migrants in the UK 491

24.6 Results 494

24.7 Conclusions and Future Research Directions 497

Acknowledgments 498

References 498

Index 501
Paul J. Lavrakas, PhD, is Senior Fellow at the NORC at the University of Chicago, Adjunct Professor at University of Illinois-Chicago, Senior Methodologist at the Social Research Centre of Australian National University and at the Office for Survey Research at Michigan State University.

Michael W. Traugott, PhD, is Research Professor in the Institute for Social Research at the University of Michigan.

Courtney Kennedy, PhD, is Director of Survey Research at Pew Research Center in Washington, DC.

Allyson L. Holbrook, PhD, is Professor of Public Administration and Psychology at the University of Illinois-Chicago.

Edith D. de Leeuw, PhD, is Professor of Survey Methodology in the Department of Methodology and Statistics at Utrecht University.

Brady T. West, PhD, is Research Associate Professor in the Survey Research Center at the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor.

P. J. Lavrakas, Nielsen Media Research; E. D. de Leeuw, Utrecht University, The Netherlands; B. T. West, University of Michigan and Joint Program in Survey Methodology