Wiley-VCH


John Wiley & Sons Epistemic Justification Cover Ever since Plato it has been thought that one knows only if one's belief hits the mark of truth and .. Product #: 978-0-631-18283-2 Regular price: $126.17 $126.17 Auf Lager

Epistemic Justification

Internalism vs. Externalism, Foundations vs. Virtues

BonJour, Laurence / Sosa, Ernest

Great Debates in Philosophy

Cover

1. Auflage April 2003
252 Seiten, Hardcover
Wiley & Sons Ltd

ISBN: 978-0-631-18283-2
John Wiley & Sons

Jetzt kaufen

Bestellung & Versand über unseren Shop oder über autorisierte Vertriebspartner.

 

Zum Shop

Weitere Versionen

MOBI

Ever since Plato it has been thought that one knows only if one's belief hits the mark of truth and does so with adequate justification. The issues debated by Laurence BonJour and Ernest Sosa concern mostly the nature and conditions of such epistemic justification, and its place in our understanding of human knowledge.

* Presents central issues pertaining to internalism vs. externalism and foundationalism vs. virtue epistemology in the form of a philosophical debate.

* Introduces students to fundamental questions within epistemology while engaging in contemporary debates.

* Written by two of today's foremost epistemologists.

* Includes an extensive bibliography.

Introduction.

Part I: A Version of Internalist Foundationalism.

Part II: Beyond Internal Foundations to External Virtues.

Part III: Replies.

Bibliography.

Index.
"It is a wonderful treat for anyone interested in epistemology to
find an exchange on the most basic epistemological problems between
two such distinguished practicioners as BonJour and Sosa. This
debate is conducted with the mastery and sophistication we have
come to expect from them. Epistemic Justification is
particularly valuable because not only does each author present and
defend a position, but each responds at considerable length to the
other." William P. Alston, Syracuse University


"BonJour and Sosa offer a penetrating exploration of the
internalism/externalism controversy in epistemology. While they
vigorously and effectively argue for quite different conclusions,
the ability of both philosophers to clearly, fairly, and
sympathetically evaluate alternative views results in an
outstanding philosophical debate that contributes greatly to our
understanding of some of the most fundamental issues in
epistemology." Richard Fumerton, University of Iowa

"The format , and the eminence of each author, makes the book a
valuable addition to the field for practitioners, but also
potentially useful as an introduction to many of the most basic
problems of contemporary epistemology." Choice, December
2003

"This book is both a livelv debate between two top
epistemologists and a recapitulation of the main lines of the
debate about epistemic justification over the last few decades.
This makes it at once appropriate for undergraduate courses in
epistemology as well as for graduate seminars. This debate is
... always rewarding." Review of Metaphysics
Laurence BonJour is Professor of Philosophy at the University of Washington, where he teaches epistemology, history of modern philosophy, metaphysics, philosophy of law, and political philosophy. He is the author of three books: The Structure of Empirical Knowledge (1985), In Defense of Pure Reason (1998), and Epistemology: Classic Problems and Contemporary Responses (2002).


Ernest Sosa is Professor of Philosophy at Brown University and Distinguished Visiting Professor at Rutgers University every spring term. He has written widely on epistemology and is author of Knowledge in Perspective (1991). Sosa and His Critics, edited by John Greco, is forthcoming in the Blackwell series, Philosophers and Their Critics.

L. BonJour, University of Washington; E. Sosa, Brown University