Quentin Skinner
History, Politics, Rhetoric
Key Contemporary Thinkers

1. Auflage April 2003
216 Seiten, Softcover
Wiley & Sons Ltd
This book is the first comprehensive exposition of the work of one
of the most important intellectual historians and political
theorists writing today.
Quentin Skinner's treatment of political theory as a dimension
of political life marks a revolutionary move in the historical as
well as the philosophical study of political thought. Skinner
brings the study of political theory closer to the language of
agents and treats theorists as politicians of a special kind. This
is as true of his accounts of his contemporaries, such as Rawls,
Rorty, Geertz and Habermas, as it is of his interpretations of
classical thinkers such as Machiavelli and Hobbes. Skinner has
become internationally renowned for this approach, which ties
together historical and contemporary analysis in order to integrate
the study of the past and the present, and which tries fully to
uncover the historical context and development of key concepts in
political theory such as freedom and the state.
This volume charts Skinner's work from the early 1960s right up
to the present, including his most recent studies in the theory of
persuasive speech, and is organized around five major themes:
history, linguistic action, political thought, liberty and
rhetoric. It pays particular attention to Skinner's work in
relation to that of continental thinkers, especially Max Weber and
Reinhart Koselleck.
The book will be essential reading for students and scholars of
political and social theory, history, philosophy and cultural
studies.
1.1. A Revolution in the Study of Political Thought.
1.2. A Political Reading.
Chapter 2. History as an Argument.
2.1. Death of Political Philosophy?.
2.2. The Defence of the Historian: Laslett and Pocock.
2.3. The 'historical' as a criterion.
2.4. The Politics of History.
Chapter 3. Theories as Moves.
3.1. Intelligibility of Politics as Activity.
3.2. The Action Perspective on Political Thought.
3.3. Ideas and Concepts as Moves in Argument.
3.4. Conventions and intentions.
3.5. Legitimation of Action.
3.6. The Innovating Ideologist.
3.7. Linguistic Action and its Legitimation.
Chapter 4. The Foundations: a History of Theory
Politics.
4.1. Genres of Studying Political Thought.
4.2. Why "Foundations"?.
4.3. The Matrix of Questions.
4.4. Ideologies and Legitimation.
4.5. The Formation of the Concept of the State.
4.6. From the History of Ideas Towards a History of
Concepts.
4.7. The Skinnerian Revolution.
Chapter 5. Rethinking Political Liberty.
5.1. Liberty as a Contested Concept Par Excellence.
5.2. Revising the Conceptual History of Liberty.
5.3. Liberty of the City-Republics.
5.4. Machiavelli as a Philosopher of Liberty.
5.5. Hobbes on Natural Liberty and the Liberty of Subjects.
5.6. The Neo-roman Theorists: Liberty vs. Dependence.
5.7. Intervention in the Contemporary Debate.
5.8. A Profile on the History and Theory of Liberty.
Chapter 6. From Philosophy to Rhetoric.
6.1. The Rise of Rhetoric.
6.2. Rhetorical Philosophy: Wittgenstein and Austin.
6.3. Skinner's Critique of Philosophy.
6.4. Rhetoric and Philosophy in Hobbes.
6.5. The rhetorical Culture of the Renaissance.
6.6. Rhetoric and the Critique of Philosophy.
6.7. Conceptual Change: from Speech Acts to Rhetoric.
6.8. Skinner and Rhetoric Studies Today.
Chapter 7. Quentin Skinner as a Contemporary Thinker.
7.1 The Intellectual Profile.
7.2. A vision of Time.
References.
than anyone, the relation between writing the history of political
thoughts and thinking about politics in history.' John
Pocock, Professor Emeritus, John Hopkins University
'Kari Palonen's impressive knowledge of
twentieth-century European historiography creates an appropriately
broad canvas for this fine study of the Cambridge contextual
historian Quentin Skinner as a political theorist in the grand
tradition. Palonen shows to what degree Skinner's projects
belong to the world post Nietzsche and post Wittgenstein, which
give priority to "life" and the "lived
experience" over theory and scholastic history (or
historicism). For the modern homo politicus no longer speaks
" for eternity", but as a person of his/her own time.
It is in this very special sense that context and text belong
together: as the ground, and perhaps the only ground, against which
human actions now have meaning'. Patricia Springborg,
University of Sydney